Views of landscapes
So how do you choose a representative piece of the landscape?
Important distinctions
Transport vs. production limited conditions
What drives processes?
What resists them?
Simple concepts of time and equilibrium

What are the landforms that you see?
What are the processes operating within this landscape?
What drives the surficial processes here?
What resists the surficial processes here?
How does energy flow in this landscape?
What can you say about the development of this landscape?
What would be a representative piece of this landscape? How would you
divide it up to get the most important processes and landforms?

or
"Method by which one thing is produced from something else."
-Ritter et al., 1995, p. 3.
-Glossary of geology
-Glossary of geology
Ideally (IMHO) , the discretization of the landscape into landforms should be done on the basis of processes operating over the earth's surface.
1) Assume balance between forms and process (equilibrium and quasi-equilibrium)
2) Balance created and maintained by the interaction between energy states (kinetic and potential); force and resistance.
3) Changes in force-resistance balance may push the landscape and processes too far: thresholds of change exist: fundamental change of process and thus form.
4) Processes are linked: processes are linked with multiple levels of feedback.
5) Geomorphic analysis occurs at different temporal scales.
Classic geomorphology (qualitative, taxonomic classification of the landscape-?stamp collecting?) versus quantitative, process-based approach.
Difficulty in applying a broad, physics based approach to landscape development. TIME and complexity.
Divided into two components:
Graded time (101 - 104 yrs); "Landforms change,
but offsetting effects maintain an average form"
Cyclic time (105 - 107 yrs); "Landforms progressively
change."
Timescale of interest depends on research question
Time is irreversible and ordered.
What are the landforms that you see?
What are the processes operating within this landscape?
What drives the surficial processes here?
What resists the surficial processes here?
How does energy flow in this landscape?
What can you say about the development of this landscape?
What would be a representative piece of this landscape? How would you
divide it up to get the most important processes and landforms?




Elements (boxes or landforms/processes?)
Boundaries (spatial and flux)
See the following examples of the key landform elements being hillslopes,
valleys, and channels and the deliniation of drainage basin as representative
piece (Montgomery and Dietrich, 1989, Source areas, Drainage density, and channel initiation, Water Resources Research, v. 25, no. 8, p. 1907-1918 and Montgomery and Dietrich, 1994, A physically based model for the topographic control on shallow landsliding, Water Resources Research, v. 30, no. 4, p. 1153-1171.)









. |
If more soil is available for transport than can be eroded, the situation is called "transport-limited;" whereas if more could be eroded than is available, the situation is called "production-limited" [Carson and Kirkby, 1972]. This material balance is based upon the ideas of Gilbert, 1877, and formulated in the manner of Ahnert, 1970; Anderson and Humphrey, 1989; and Carson and Kirkby, 1972.
In order to address those possible conditions, we must consider the volume flow rate per unit width, Q, separately from the transport capacity of the specified process per unit width, Qt [Anderson and Humphrey, 1989; Rosenbloom and Anderson, 1994]. In general, Q < Qt ; Qt depends upon the predefined behavior of the process transporting material along the profile. If conditions are completely transport-limited, Q = Qt and the process is transporting at full capacity. However, by allowing for a production-limited condition, the process may not carry at full capacity because the amount of erosion is limited by supply. Thus, Q < Qt.
References for this quote:
Ahnert, F., Brief description of a comprehensive three-dimensional process-response model of landform development, Zeitschrift fur Geomorph., Supplementband, 24, 11-22, 1970.
Anderson, R. S. and N. F. Humphrey, Interaction of weathering and transport processes in the evolution of arid landscapes, in Quantitative dynamic stratigraphy, edited by T. A. Cross, pp. 349-361, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1989.
Carson, M. A. and M. J. Kirkby, Hillslope form and process, 475 p., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1972.
Gilbert, G. K., Report on the geology of the Henry Mountains, U.S. Geographical and Geological Survey of the Rocky Mountain Region, Washington, D.C., 1877.
Rosenbloom, N. A. and R. S. Anderson, Hillslope and channel evolution
in the marine terraced landscape, Santa Cruz, California, Journal of
Geophysical Research, Tectonics and Topography Special Volume, 99, 14,013-14,029,
1994.
